- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 19:55:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It's not really a logical combination pseudo, which is why we didn't include it in that list in the first place. Logical combination pseudos don't do anything at all, theoretically, that you couldn't achieve by just writing out the selectors manually. (Well, `:not()` is a new ability, but it's such a clear mirror to what its argument can do that it's *morally* not new.) So allowing them, with the caveat that you can only use arguments that could already show up there by themselves, doesn't raise any questions. `:has()` *is* totally new functionality, and can't be treated as cavalierly. Editing for #10693 needs to be a bit more fiddly, unfortunately. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/10749#issuecomment-2305523453 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2024 19:55:57 UTC