- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 17:12:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
If I understand it correctly, the proposal to handle spanning items, is that: - For `empty-tracks: hide`, we collapse tracks not marked as filled by some item. For `empty-tracks: auto` there are more conditions on the track sizing functions. - Non-spanning items just mark their track as filled - Spanning items mark the spanned tracks with the greatest number of items as filled So for example, if item A spans tracks 1-5, item B spans tracks 1-5, item C spans tracks 3-7, and item D spans tracks 6-8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | A | A | A | A | A | | | | | B | B | B | B | B | | | | | | | C | C | C | C | C | | | | | | | | D | D | D | Then A,B,C mark tracks 3-5 as filled, and D marks tracks 6-7 as filled. So we collapse tracks 1-2 and 8. Is that right? -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5813#issuecomment-2302582640 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 17:12:49 UTC