- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:42:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-cascade-6] Publish an updated WD`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: we publish current draft, and we open an issue for the multiple nested scopes` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <matthieud> miriam: we want to publish an updated for cascade-6 with @scope<br> <matthieud> miriam: we are not tracking multiple scope proximity, we only look at the proximity of the single closest one<br> <matthieud> miriam: do we need to resolved that first or we can publish and keeping this opened ?<br> <TabAtkins> matthieud: I think this is about taking into account nested scope, and instead of just looking at the closest one to do disambiguation..<br> <TabAtkins> matthieud: If the closest is equal in scope, you'd go up one level, etc<br> <TabAtkins> miriam: Right. Tho there's also an issue about if there's a different number of scopes.<br> <TabAtkins> matthieud: Yeah, I see no reason why it should only be the first one.<br> <TabAtkins> matthieud: Don't have giant use-cases for the nested ones, but still seems weird we completely forget about the outer scopes.<br> <matthieud> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: we publish current draft, and we open an issue for the multiple nested scopes<br> <fantasai> sgtm<br> <matthieud> RESOLVED: we publish current draft, and we open an issue for the multiple nested scopes<br> <bramus> 🎉<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10370#issuecomment-2302527862 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 16:42:01 UTC