- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 22:03:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, sorry, it wasn't clear to me that the intention was to have :host:has() match the contents of the shadow tree. I think it's a bit confusing that `:host:has()` and `:host(:has())` would do such different things, fwiw, but it's not like I have a counter-proposal if this is something people need... It just feels a bit weird conceptually that we'd match the fragment's subtree but then forward the selector to the real element... -- GitHub Notification of comment by emilio Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10693#issuecomment-2276743599 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2024 22:03:59 UTC