- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 19:39:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> We went with `color-layers()` in [#8431 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8431#issuecomment-2274558595) so I think we should definitely not go with the singular `background-layer` here. :) I want to point out that _all_ list-valued properties so far have singular names, e.g. `transition`, `animation`, `box-shadow`, and so do all `background-*` properties. So, even when it's clearer using the plural version here, it breaks consistency. That said, I don't have a strong opinion on this. What I _do_ have a strong opinion about is the lack of votings so far. It would be great if we got some more opinions on this, so we can resolve on a name. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9083#issuecomment-2276527678 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2024 19:39:29 UTC