- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 22:51:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't understand this objection. Having different value spaces between the two types isn't a problem, so long as one is a superset of the other, and afaik that's precisely what we intend to preserve - every single behavior you can express with `path()` should be expressible with `shape()`, and `shape()` might grow *additional* commands that we don't sync back with SVG. The intermediate value would just be `shape()` - you'd "upgrade" the `path()` into an equivalent `shape()` and then interpolate using `shape()` rules. This sort of behavior has several existing examples in CSS. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10694#issuecomment-2270051690 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 5 August 2024 22:51:42 UTC