- From: Simon Fraser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 23:10:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
smfr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-shapes-2] In `shape()` It should be possible to specify control points relative to their point on the curve == In CSS Basic Shapes 2, the `[shape()](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-2/#shape-function)` function allows you specify points with `to` or `by` which indicates whether the point, _and its control points_, are specified in "absolute" terms relative to the bounding box, or in "relative" terms from the current path point. However, in many cases I think authors will want to specify control points relative to the path point that they are attached to. I should be able to say something like `curve to 120px 140px with -12px -10px / 15px 20px` to say that the first control point is at `-12px -10px` relative to the start of the segment, and the second one is at `15px 20px` relative to the end point. We'd need some reasonable behavior for quadratic segments, and smooth segments. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10667 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2024 23:10:40 UTC