- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:23:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> We could just disable mutation events during the scope of this DOM copying. We are trying to disable mutation events entirely anyway, so disabling them in this case sounds very reasonable to me. Ah, true, that makes sense. Then that's not a factor either way, I'd think. > Another question I have if we go with option 2: The pseudo-element would have to target the ShadowRoot node in order to access all of its children independently. Is it possible to have a pseudo-element map to a ShadowRoot node which is technically not an element? Yes, that's conceptually fine. It's just an "element" that is prevented from ever generating a box. But the inheritance story is a little funky in that case. Would the elements inherit from the pseudo-element? That hasn't happened before (only pseudo-to-pseudo), and I'm not sure if it's problematic in implementations or not. Just using light-DOM children instead avoids us having to answer any of these questions. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10242#issuecomment-2087102812 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2024 20:24:00 UTC