- From: Chris Armstrong via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:11:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Would it be fair to say that the arguments so far fall into roughly two camps? - **_What_ it does:** Masonry is just another kind of grid, so it should be part of grid - **_How_ it does it:** Masonry requires a completely different approach to calculating its layout, so it should be a separate thing If so, then perhaps the question is: which of these approaches is more consistent with how the rest of CSS has been architected? Should declarations be based more on _what_ a thing does, or _how_ it does it? -- GitHub Notification of comment by chrisarmstrong Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10233#issuecomment-2086693439 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2024 19:11:40 UTC