- From: Nate King via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:40:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm all for having this part of the grid spec. I would recommend simplicity over the friction of adding a new display type or even language that is not consistently used across regions (eg: masonry vs waterfall). I would go further to recommend simplifying the feature by using `grid-templates-rows: collapse` as this is what is actually happening. I find the rows 'off' usage a bit misleading but I would be fine with either. Again simplicity/less friction in usage for the user seems key and having a single option to implement this as a layout option, while retaining the full power of grid and subgrid as part of the capability without adding more or divergent syntax seems like a massive win for the web developer. -- GitHub Notification of comment by codewisenate Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10233#issuecomment-2085530694 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2024 14:40:12 UTC