Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] Designer/developer feedback on masonry layout (#10233) from Ebisucom via GitHub on 2024-04-30 (public-css-archive@w3.org from April 2024)

From: Ebisucom via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:54:59 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-2084142853-1714442097-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> Should "masonry"/"waterfall" be part of CSS Grid?

Yes. 
When compared to the masonry-like layout created with CSS Grid Level 1,  `grid-template-rows: masonry` simply creates a grid without rows. This made me naturally accept it as a part of CSS Grid. So a value like "off" being proposed is understandable.

![grid-and-masonry-layout-large](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/assets/49944455/356908be-2d6f-494c-b573-9f6ef7e6b533)

I also wrote about this in my blog: https://medium.com/@ebisucom/css-grid-and-masonry-layout-24a5dff6ba8e

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ebisucomtechlab
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10233#issuecomment-2084142853 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2024 01:55:00 UTC