Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5][various] Better handling of arguments with commas (#9539)

I am worried about cases like `fn(<options>, <argument-list>)` or `fn(<options>, <argument>#)`, and more generally, about how the reification will be translated in terms of the value definition syntax. I am not sure you plan to define `<argument-list>` and `<argument>#` as *implicit* comma-containing productions. But I will simply wait for your changes, do not bother clarifying this now.

  > if a `<semicolon-token>` is encountered, then the functional notation is re-interpreted with all commas in the grammar replaced by `<semicolon-token>`s

Note that you can interpret the functional notation *once*, based on whether the input list of component values has a `<semicolon-token>`. I mean, the *re-* prefix is not mandatory, imo.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9539#issuecomment-2081312438 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Sunday, 28 April 2024 03:42:03 UTC