- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:29:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Re: `next` vs `pack` - yeah, Oriol's argument makes sense. If you have some `<details>` in your masonry, and you don't want the layout to jiggle when you open one, `next` will keep things nice and stable. Your layout will be *worse*, but it'll be *stable*, and I think that's a tradeoff that's reasonable for authors to make sometimes. (On the other hand, as noted elsewhere, using `masonry-threshold: calc(infinity)` is identical to `pack`, so we might be able to get away with just using that, perhaps with a note to authors about it. But I'm not opposed to keeping the keyword if it's a more straightforward/learnable way to express this, and then having a note that it makes `masonry-threshold` powerless.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9988#issuecomment-2080139964 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 26 April 2024 21:29:07 UTC