Re: [csswg-drafts] Alternate masonry path forward (#9041)

I would also like to *strongly* advocate for the performance characteristics (and specifically of the default or easy to use styles) being strongly weighted in the debate (to the point that poor performance should be considered a deal breaker). 

Performance is already an problem for CSS layout (with both Flexbox and CSS Grid having exponential complexity unless one goes out of one's way to use styles like `min-width: 0px` on all flexbox items and `minmax(0, 1fr)` instead of `1fr` for grid tracks). And I would like to see this fixed rather than new performance issues introduced. If that means intrinsic sizing of masonry columns being excluded entirely then so be it.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nicoburns
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2076070353 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 25 April 2024 00:04:07 UTC