Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] Designer/developer feedback on masonry layout (#10233)

> Should “masonry”/“waterfall” be part of CSS Grid?
Absolutely - it's a grid and I want to use all the capabilities of one with the waterfall layout
 
> Do you want the capabilities to define a columnar grid with CSS Grid — to use subgrid, spanning, explicit placement, and all the many options for track sizing? Or do you only want the ability to define a classic masonry layout with equal-sized columns?
PLEASE! I'd love to use the capability and the flexibility that comes with it. Explicit placement is less interesting to me than the other mentioned features

> Will you use this? What might you create with it?
Yes, most immediately on a personal profile with a boring static sized grid right now

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dgattey
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10233#issuecomment-2075497844 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2024 17:41:52 UTC