- From: theChosenOne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:39:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm all for `display: grid` being extended, it's also quite logical in my view. I think the proposed syntax is a logical syntax, you're effectively independently defining a masonry layout in either direction. One difficulty for me would be, how should the following behave? ``` display: grid; grid-template-rows: masonry; grid-template-columns: masonry; ``` This could be a messy layout as follows: <img width="1161" alt="image" src="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/assets/8543370/14e83e4a-1184-4afc-89db-5610422aea0b"> Or should this be an error condition? If this shouldn't be allowed, it would be a slight problem for me, because it seems to break the line independence of css. Now by adding line 3, you've effectively broken the way line 2 should work. So this case would need to lead to a reasonable layout. > But then my question would be, **is this still a grid**? -- GitHub Notification of comment by saivan Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10233#issuecomment-2072194396 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2024 12:39:40 UTC