- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:24:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Fully agree with @emilio. I _initially_ thought that we should serialize back to bare declarations for outer `cssText` since it's shorter, nicer, and basically "why not". But the round-trip issues and other edge cases convinced me the other way. @LeaVerou You said that we should consider another name for `@nest`, would that mitigate the situation? If the name better explains what it does/is, maybe its presence will feel less offensive? `@this`? `@self`? `@wart`? > changing APIs in ways that are confusing / inconsistent (like not returning rules from .cssRules) Yes, let's avoid this, please. Getting creative about the OM structure is even more intrusive than getting creative about its serialization. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8738#issuecomment-2060688693 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2024 08:24:29 UTC