Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738)

Yeah, I was talking about cases like `.cssText`, where it's serialized as part of an outer rule. I don't have an opinion on what should happen if it's serialized by itself. What I'm trying to avoid is authors getting `@nest` rules that they never specified. Since given an `@nest` rule, it's _far_ more likely that it was implicitly generated, rather than author-specified, I'd rather have serialization follow the principle of least surprise.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8738#issuecomment-2059447839 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2024 16:06:54 UTC