- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:23:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I honestly have no idea what is confusing you here. What is confusing me is that, by my interpretation, `none` does not represent the analogous component. It makes a channel missing and missing channels are filled in with analogous components. - `none` causes missing components. - missing component are filled in with analogous components. But this proposed change would change the specification so that `none` itself is replaced at every position it is used. It is taking me some time to wrap my head around this, mostly because I am also thinking about the impact on implementations. ------- > I think 1 makes more sense, but we need to clarify. I agree, if the concept is to preserve `none` when possible then it makes sense to continue along that line. ------- I would also like to have @tabatkins opinion on this as this has a wider impact than only css colors. And I also think implementers would need to weigh in on this to make sure that this is even possible. -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10151#issuecomment-2054188251 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 14 April 2024 21:23:24 UTC