- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 10:12:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I would err on the side of favoring the component meaning of none. But what is that meaning in the context of math expressions? A channel value of `none` is not the same as using `none` in a math expression. Even when that `none` in a math expression originated from an origin color in relative color syntax. I don't have any preference or objection. But I am really not seeing what `calc(none + 20)` is supposed to do or how authors are supposed to benefit from this. Can you provide examples of inputs/outputs? ------------ > > I took a weird turn somewhere and started imagining preserving `calc(none + 20)` resulting in `hsl(calc(none + 20) 50% 50%)` as the final value. > Er, yes, that is the correct final value. Obviously, that is not useful by itself, but it becomes concrete once you interpolate. How? For example : ``` color-mix( in hsl, hsl(from hsl(none 50% 50%) calc(h + 20) s l), hsl(50deg 50% 50%) ) ``` What is result of this? A: 1. `calc(h + 20)` is `0 + 20` 2. interpolated as `(20 + 50) / 2` 3. results in `hsl(35deg 50% 50%)` B: 1. `calc(h + 20)` is `none` 2. interpolated as `(50 + 50) / 2` 3. results in `hsl(50deg 50% 50%)` C: 1. `calc(h + 20)` remains `calc(none + 20)` 2. interpolated as ??? 3. results in ??? Also keep in mind that there should be any practical difference between manually writing `none` and channel keywords. ```css hsl(from hsl(none 50% 50%) calc(h + 20) s l) hsl(calc(none + 20) s l) ``` ```css --foo: calc(none + 20) hsl(var(--foo) s l) ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10151#issuecomment-2053995227 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:12:07 UTC