- From: Dominik Röttsches via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:27:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think the summary is correct, but how do we bring the following in agreement? @drott wrote: > I suggest ... to specify that for the parsed CSSOM cssText value of the parsed at-rule keyword representations should be returned. @fantasai wrote: > If strings are the most backwards-compatible syntax, then we must serialize as strings, not as keywords. Can we have a mixed serialization type? Such as every format that has a keyword equivalent is serialized as a keyword, and the rest as strings? I think it's beneficial to allow a round-trip of keywords to keywords - and I would hope at some point to phase out the strings here. I think serialization to strings is in the way of that. But if we can't have a mixed serialization as keyword or string, I am okay with always serializing to strings, even if that downgrades a more specific type of keyword, to a more generic type, string. -- GitHub Notification of comment by drott Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6328#issuecomment-2049695160 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2024 13:27:43 UTC