- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:41:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah this is also important because depending on what behavior we decide, we might need to revert the resolution in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9621 (or change it so that we serialize to `:where(:scope)`, but that's a bit weird... I think it's very weird that: ``` > .foo ``` Has different specificity than: ``` :scope > .foo ``` in this case... cc @mirisuzanne @tabatkins -- GitHub Notification of comment by emilio Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10196#issuecomment-2048401873 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2024 20:41:58 UTC