Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Specificity of Implicitly-Added `:scope` in Scoped Rules (#10196)

Yeah this is also important because depending on what behavior we decide, we might need to revert the resolution in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9621 (or change it so that we serialize to `:where(:scope)`, but that's a bit weird...

I think it's very weird that:

```
> .foo
```

Has different specificity than:

```
:scope > .foo
```

in this case...

cc @mirisuzanne @tabatkins 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by emilio
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10196#issuecomment-2048401873 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2024 20:41:58 UTC