- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 10:20:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> That seems ok. Although I'm not sure how you'd add the "but consider ink overflow" option in future. (I realise I'm not being a lot of help here) I think in the future we can add a `view-transition-inclusion-edge` property that defaults to `border-box` and can be `ink-box` (or some such) -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8282#issuecomment-2034169583 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2024 10:20:36 UTC