- From: Gwern Branwen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 23:07:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
One further thing I would mention after looking at the mobile screenshot pairs too, which look better than I expected: https://share.obormot.net/temp/text-wrap_screenshots_mobile.zip It's hard to predict what Chrome `pretty` currently does! I've stared at many of these, but still can't look at the 'before' and predict what will happen in the 'after', particularly how the word-orphans are treated. As best as I can tell, word-orphan fixes are strictly subordinate to the hyphenation changes: it doesn't seem like the word-orphans ever get changed unless there is a previous hyphenation change already being made, regardless of how easy & straightforward a word-orphan change might be. It *seems* like `pretty` treats word-orphans as an add-on or afterthought, to be modified only if it's already doing a change, otherwise, not modified at all...? This is confusing, and I don't think users understand it - I don't recall any of the people advertising `pretty` as 'solving your word-orphan problems` on Twitter/StackOverflow/Reddit as including the caveat 'but only if that word-orphan is part of a paragraph whose hyphenation is being changed already, otherwise all your word-orphans are still there'. And I don't think anyone would request a feature like "fix my word-orphans but only some of the time, dependent on a usually unrelated problem being fixed". ("What Would Knuth Do?" Probably not that.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by gwern Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3473#issuecomment-2033261361 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2024 23:07:27 UTC