- From: Alan Stearns via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:47:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks for all the examples, @gwern. I’m not sure I agree they are all failures of the current implementation. Most of the after results appear better or at least as good as the befores to me. For instance, 49/50 does have wider spacing but I think it’s arguably better (spacing is still consistent across the paragraph and a 2-hyphen ladder is removed). And 53/54 does have wider spacing but it might be a case where justification in general is causing problems (there is an unaffected line starting with “reader mode” that looks bad both before and after). The ones I do see a problem with are 65/66 is a bad result, I agree 69/70 the sidenote is worse, but the main column change looks OK 71/72 is worse, likely because the current implementation isn’t looking back enough lines 81/82 sidenote 31 is worse, but the rest of the changes look OK 89/90 is worse, but the narrow columns make this a hard case. Perhaps the weighting against a short last line should not have resulted in any change for the first two paragraphs, but the third seems fine -- GitHub Notification of comment by astearns Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3473#issuecomment-2032976566 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2024 19:47:33 UTC