Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Is it intentional that :has(:is()) is different from :has()? (#9422) from Oriol Brufau via GitHub on 2023-09-28 (public-css-archive@w3.org from September 2023)

From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:26:27 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1739356873-1695911186-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I always assumed it was intentional...

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9422#issuecomment-1739356873 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 28 September 2023 14:26:29 UTC