- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 04:20:54 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
To make the case for (7), it's consistent with feature-specific rules like `@font-feature-values`, where the rule is specific enough and we don't try to create rules that support future unknown thing. The feature here is navigation view-transitions, so maybe that's what the name of the rule should be. Also makes feature-detection with `@supports(at-rule)` more explicit. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9383#issuecomment-1732206129 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 23 September 2023 04:20:56 UTC