- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 19:05:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Looks good to me, thank you! So it should be [`character-variant(<feature-value-name>#{2})`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#character-variant)?
I was waiting for Tab and Simon answers on how to represent font feature value rules in a production. But now `w3c/webref` can scrap these rule definitions, I think. In this https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9114#issuecomment-1649700594, I suggested using definition tables, but I am not sure how it could work with these rules. I will keep an eye on this issue.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9311#issuecomment-1731914918 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 22 September 2023 19:06:01 UTC