- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 13:55:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
[Pedro Mascarenhas](https://typography.guru/journal/should-we-standardize-the-naming-of-font-weights-r80/), for [TyMS](https://pedromascarenhas.wixsite.com/tyms), suggested the following mappings in 2021, based on the ratio of primary stem thickness to cap height: | [TyMS Keyword](https://typography.guru/uploads/monthly_2021_03/Image-05.gif.5f1a8cb74c17dfbbb0f2c5567377c092.gif) | [CSS4](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-weight-absolute-values) | Numeric `<font-weight>` | | --- | --- | --- | | `micro-line` | | 50 | | `hair-line` | _thin_ | 100 | | `thin` | | 150 | | `ultra-light` | _extra/ultra light_ | 200 | | **`extra-light`** | | 250 | | **`light`** | _light_ | 300 | | `semi-light` | | 350 | | `regular` | `normal` | 400 | | `book` | | 450 | | **`medium`** | _medium_ | 500 | | — | | 550 | | **`demi-bold`** | _semi/demi bold_ | 600 | | `semi-bold` | | 650 | | **`bold`** | `bold` | 700 | | `heavy` | | 750 | | **`extra-bold`** | _extra/ultra bold_ | 800 | | `ultra-bold` | | 850 | | `black` | _black / heavy_ | 900 | | `extra-black` | | 950 | | `ultra-black` | | 1000 | -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4048#issuecomment-1725631090 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2023 13:55:30 UTC