- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 19:45:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Crissov has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == New length unit as a fractional part of `rem` == @romainmenke wrote in [#9293](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9293#issuecomment-1708156736) > Some samples from real CSS I have access to : ``` animation: MAP_LOADING_ANIMATION 1.4925373134328357s cubic-bezier(0, 0.2, 0.8, 1) infinite; animation-delay: -0.7462686567164178s; line-height: 1.307692307; padding-top: 237.037037%; height: calc(4em * 1.57142857); padding-bottom: 68.115942%; letter-spacing: 0.046875rem; height: 117.1875px; padding-top: 117.1875%; letter-spacing: 0.046875rem; letter-spacing: 0.038125rem; letter-spacing: 0.054375rem; letter-spacing: 0.038125rem; letter-spacing: 0.114375rem; letter-spacing: 0.163125rem; letter-spacing: 0.070625rem; letter-spacing: 0.054375rem; letter-spacing: 0.040625rem; max-width: 48.4375rem; max-width: 30.9375rem; width: calc(100% - 10.6875rem); max-width: 59.8125rem; width: 10.9375rem; width: 14.1875rem; width: 10.9375rem; padding-bottom: 42.8571%; padding: 0.59375rem 1.25rem; letter-spacing: 0.03375rem; letter-spacing: 0.03625rem; letter-spacing: 0.03125rem; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 10.6875rem); min-width: 10.6875rem; width: 10.6875rem; max-width: 23.4375rem; width: 10.3125rem; max-width: 20.9375rem; max-width: 26.0625rem; letter-spacing: 0.03125rem; --width-mobile-nav-xsmall: 19.6875rem; top: 66.6667vw; letter-spacing: -0.03125rem; width: 14.3125rem; width: 11.5625rem; letter-spacing: 0.04375rem; letter-spacing: -0.03125rem; letter-spacing: -0.09375rem; letter-spacing: 0.02125rem; letter-spacing: -0.03125rem; letter-spacing: -0.09375rem; letter-spacing: 0.04375rem; letter-spacing: 0.05625rem; letter-spacing: 0.03375rem; letter-spacing: 0.02625rem; padding: 0.78125rem 3.125rem; margin-bottom: 2.15625rem; padding-bottom: 10.3125rem; margin-bottom: 3.45625rem; margin-bottom: 2.45625rem; padding: 0.78125rem 3.125rem; margin-top: 0.78125rem; width: 27.3125rem; padding-top: 1.15625rem; margin-bottom: 13.3125rem; bottom: calc(0.90625rem + 1.6875rem); padding-top: 1.71875rem; padding-bottom: 2.03125rem; padding-top: 1.90625rem; padding-top: 23.0625rem; margin-top: 10.9375rem; margin-bottom: 10.9375rem; grid-template-columns: 28.25rem 32.6875rem; padding-top: 12.8125rem; min-height: 10.9375rem; min-height: 13.4375rem; top: calc(50% - 0.03125rem); grid-auto-rows: calc(72.1875vw + 3.125rem); min-height: calc(72.1875vw + 3.125rem); top: calc(50% - 0.03125rem); grid-auto-rows: calc(72.1875vw + 3.125rem); min-height: calc(72.1875vw + 3.125rem); top: calc(50% - 0.03125rem); grid-auto-rows: calc(72.1875vw + 3.125rem); min-height: calc(72.1875vw + 3.125rem); min-width: 11.5625rem; ``` There are a lot of `rem` lengths in this sample, many of which are obviously the results of converting pixel values with a ratio of 16 `px` per `rem`. All of them can be expressed by `px` values with two digits after the decimal point, or less. Assuming this is indeed a frequent way to use root-ems, there could be value in introducing a new unit which is a subdivision of `rem` corresponding 1:1 or 100:1 to default pixels, e.g.: * `16rp` = `1rem`, `1rp` ≈ `1px` * `1600rx` = `1rem`, `1rx` ≈ `0.01px` Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9345 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2023 19:45:21 UTC