- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 09:12:29 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
noamr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-view-transitions-2] resolve on descriptor/parameter names == The current [editor's draft](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-view-transitions-2/) defines a few new names. We should resolve whether they're the right names or should be changed. Current spec: ```css /* css */ @view-transition { navigation: auto | none; type: foo bar; } ``` ```js /* js */ document.startViewTransition({ update: () => { ... }, type: ["foo", "bar"] }); viewTransitionRule.type // DOMTokenList ``` Proposing that: - The navigation-type descriptor is `navigation`, and its current possible values are `auto` and `none`. - The type descriptor is `type`. Its default value is an empty list. There is no `none` value or so. - The JS parameter for `startViewTransition` as well as the property name in the CSSOM rule can be `typeList`, to be consistent with `classList`, as it receives some sort of iterable. Alternatively we can keep it as `type` or use `types`. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9534 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 28 October 2023 09:12:31 UTC