- From: François REMY via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:32:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> @FremyCompany Your idea would imply a combinatorial explosion? @Loirooriol If this is just to solve the problem of #8738, no, because nothing can be nested inside this rewritten rule. They are created only at parse time for promoted declarations. If this is to solve the general discomfort with `&` being `:is(...)`, then yes. As I mentioned, I do not have a strong opinion on that. -- GitHub Notification of comment by FremyCompany Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9492#issuecomment-1779744156 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2023 17:32:36 UTC