- From: François REMY via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:55:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think the issue mentioned on the call (and some people didn't really understand) is that:
```css
article, .article { color: red;
& * { color: green; }
}
```
maps to
```css
article, .article { color: red; }
:is(article, .article) * {}
```
which has a different specificity from
```css
article, .article { color: red }
article *, .article * { color: green }
```
and I would have expected the latter one, not the first one
--
GitHub Notification of comment by FremyCompany
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9492#issuecomment-1779685090 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2023 16:55:09 UTC