- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:16:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@frivoal Right, agree. The comparison table for "what each value can achieve" is very important for choosing the initial value. We want to choose the initial value that provides the best results in the widest use cases. Your and @kidayasuo's comments are very helpful for that. Another table is needed for choosing the initial value, to ensure "which value is safe to ship for existing content." With your comment, I started thinking about creating one table that contains both, but that'll likely be very complex, as we'll want to add comments a lot more to all other cells too. As you might agree, so many people have words to say for their favorite styles. When comparing "valuable" and "safe", I think we want to choose the one that is "the most valuable value within the safe values." If there's a consensus here, it will be 2 step process; filter by safety, then filter by valuableness. I created this table for the first step, because currently proposed initial value turned out to break portal sites in Japan, and the risk is beyond what our team can ship. So, to all, I'd like to suggest us to focus on the safety and web-compat first. If we find multiple safe candidates, we can discuss their values. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9511#issuecomment-1778747844 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2023 08:16:09 UTC