- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:09:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I should think about your most recent comment -- but before I forget I want to add a clarification to https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/918#issuecomment-1760332214 . It's actually a little more complicated because I think the additional condition for applying an element's own `backface-visibility` is that the parent has `transform-style: preserve-3d` *and* the element has a `transform`. (But the key difference is that in this case it doesn't require that the transform be 3D in any way.) We discussed a few testcases related to this in https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4935628 and once we actually settle on a spec we should make sure to add those testcases (with correct rendering results!) to WPT. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/918#issuecomment-1769075446 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2023 18:09:23 UTC