- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 22:04:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> So in all I think that means I disagree with all of your changes, and we should just use mine. ^_^
I don't want to hold back the important changes any longer. So I'm fine with specifying the [syntax proposed by you back in May](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/549#issuecomment-1561547073). I'll file separate issues for the other changes suggested where I see the need for further discussion.
The only thing I just don't get is why you are against adding optional `<length-percentage>`s to the `start` and `end` keywords you proposed. `start` and `end` are aliases for `block-{start|end}` and `inline-{start|end}`, which do allow `<length-percentage>`s as offsets. So it is consequent to allow them there as well.
Sebastian
--
GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/549#issuecomment-1767262724 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2023 22:04:38 UTC