- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:28:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
noamr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:
== [css-view-transitions-2] Syntax & final names for choosing types in navigation-based view-transitions ==
Now that we have consensus (% bikeshedding) about the opt-in and transition [types](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-view-transitions-2/#ViewTransition-start-with-options), it's time to figure out how they work together.
The initial use-case is to simply be able to set a transition type for cross-document navigations, and also override it based on conditionals (@media, @supports). Once we have semantics to classify a navigation, this would become even more important.
So for example:
```css
@view-transition {
  trigger: navigation;
}
@media (orientation: landscape) {
  trigger: navigation;
  types: slide-from-top reverse; 
}
```
The current name for this is `types`, but there are several suggestions in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8960#issuecomment-1722259058, e.g.:
* `active-types`
* `type-list`
* `active-set`
* `scene`
 
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9461 using your GitHub account
-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2023 06:28:47 UTC