Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] move "balance | stable | pretty" out of text-wrap (#9102)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-text-4] move "balance | stable | pretty" out of text-wrap`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: text-wrap-mode`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;lea> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9102#issuecomment-1747785298<br>
&lt;fantasai> lea: This async poll had a difference, that did not allow input from WG members (because we did it first, before deciding to add emojis)<br>
&lt;fantasai> lea: I think the version with emojis worked really well<br>
&lt;fantasai> lea: the reactions also bumped the comment up which made the comment more visible<br>
&lt;fantasai> lea: and also we were able to get both opinions at a glance, whereas here we only get WG perspecive<br>
&lt;fantasai> lea: here we got 10 votes, `text-wrap-mode` seems to be a clear winner, but not as definitive<br>
&lt;florian> q+<br>
&lt;Rossen_> q?<br>
&lt;fantasai> lea: both me and Brad said they would prefer `white-space-wrap` if it were an option<br>
&lt;Rossen_> ack florian<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: between two choices, I did abstain. i would be against white-space-wrap<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: poll is leaning text-wrap-mode<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: any objections?<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: text-wrap-mode<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9102#issuecomment-1758101036 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2023 16:51:07 UTC