- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 15:49:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@alice I just reviewed your proposed text, and this does look good to me. Simple and to the point. Given the WHATWG's policies, I don't know if HTML would land this prior to having 2 implementations, which might make it a little tricky temporarily from a spec dependency point of view: assuming the CSSWG supports your edits, our approach would be to land your PR into a draft prior to implementations existing, so that the spec can guide those implementations. But only landing the CSS half without the HTML half doesn't make much sense here. If we accept this, I wonder if we should temporarily monkey-patch HTML, describing the change we would make to HTML in the CSS spec, until HTML itself lands it, at which point we could remove that from the CSS side. Luckily the change to HTML is minimal. We should probably ask the WHATWG how they prefer to deal with this. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7693#issuecomment-1750962229 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 6 October 2023 15:49:39 UTC