Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738)

I think I was initially for option 1, but gradually moved towards option 2.

Mainly, deciding for me are the “designing the language for the future” combined with the case being very rare and usually considered a bad practice by itself. If it was something that is present in all current preprocessors, but very commonly used it would be a different story, but this is a case of an edge-case, where preprocessors decided to interop for some reason.

I think it should be ok to handle this edge-case differently, but properly.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kizu
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8738#issuecomment-1749687009 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 5 October 2023 21:39:04 UTC