- From: Robert Flack via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:50:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> If both of these have `start`, you'll have at least two snap positions regardless of the size of the boxes, right? Wouldn't having two snap positions cause the gaps issue we're trying to avoid, or are gaps at the start / end special? If we want to preserve I could see an option 7 where we join the outer area with the preceding inner area only if there is a subsequent inner area. This allows the extra portion of the outer area to be snappable before the first nested inner area and after the last nested area but eliminates those snaps to gaps between inner areas. -- GitHub Notification of comment by flackr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9187#issuecomment-1830480012 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2023 18:50:20 UTC