- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:17:02 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Should have been the other way round, i.e. it should be in the "Rough Interoperability" section No, the order (from most complete to least complete) is: [2.1 Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) — The Official Definition](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-2023/#css-official) [2.2 Fairly Stable Modules with limited implementation experience](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-2023/#fairly-stable) [2.3 Modules with Rough Interoperability](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-2023/#rough-interop) 2.2 means "completed design work, and are fairly stable" while 2.3 means "their details are not fully worked out or sufficiently well-specified and they need more testing and bugfixing" i.e. not completed. See for example - https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6908 where a spec was moved up from 2.2 Fairly Stable to 2.1 Official (the issue being that it was copied not moved, so occurred in both places). -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9566#issuecomment-1828375320 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 27 November 2023 18:17:04 UTC