- From: Tim Nguyen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 09:30:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I would prefer allowing `:active-view-transition` over `:active-view-transition()` (as an alias to `:active-view-transition(*)`). The former reads "There is an active view transition" whereas the latter reads as "There is an active view transition with empty arguments". So the former makes more sense as a short syntax for `:active-view-transition(*)` -- GitHub Notification of comment by nt1m Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9626#issuecomment-1826734130 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 26 November 2023 09:30:33 UTC