- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:39:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
vmpstr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-view-transition-2] Should :active-view-transition() without parameter be a valid syntax == This came up in discussion of #9546 We currently only allow `*` or a list as valid parameters. Should we also allow no parameter to mean the same thing as the asterisk? I don't have a strong preference. My weak preference is to keep requiring a parameter. This seems more consistent with things like `:is()` and `:has()` which, AFAIK, do require a parameter. Although, my sense that this is not really a valid precedence. @fantasai @atanassov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9627 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2023 17:39:22 UTC