- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:49:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
If they don't bring any new functionality, I'm not convinced this is worth it. That said, it's maybe a bit strange for `top` and `bottom` to be [flow-relative](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-4/#logical-directions), while `left` and `right` are [line-relative](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-4/#line-directions): | Keyword | Type | Meaning | | - | - | - | | `top`, `bottom` | flow-relative | block-start, block-end | | `left`, `right` | line-relative | line-left, line-right | | `inline-start`, `inline-end` | flow-relative | inline-start, inline-end | If compat allows it, it could make more sense to treat `top` and `bottom` as line-over and line-under, and then add `block-start` and `block-end` as flow-relative: | Keyword | Type | Meaning | | - | - | - | | `top`, `bottom` | line-relative | line-over, line-under | | `left`, `right` | line-relative | line-left, line-right | | `inline-start`, `inline-end` | flow-relative | inline-start, inline-end | | `block-start`, `block-end` | flow-relative | block-start, block-end | -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9623#issuecomment-1823135450 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2023 16:49:50 UTC