- From: Matthieu Dubet via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:09:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
mdubet has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-scoping] Always serialise the implicit `:scope` ? == For the css-nesting spec, we resolved to always serialise the implicit `&`: > When serializing a [relative selector](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#relative-selector) in a [nested style rule](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-nesting/#nested-style-rule), the selector must be absolutized, with the implied [nesting selector](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-nesting/#nesting-selector) inserted. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-nesting/#cssom Should we do the same for the implicit `:scope` in scoped style rule ? > They accept a [relative-selector-list](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#typedef-relative-selector-list) as their prelude (rather than just a [selector-list](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#typedef-selector-list)). Such [relative selectors](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#relative-selector) are relative to [:scope](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#scope-pseudo). Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9621 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2023 14:09:45 UTC