- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:16:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Literally, this was intended to be absolutely nothing but a movement of syntax; Ah, OK. That's not how I read it. But I think I get it now, thanks. Instead of the author explicitly creating the "position package" via inset-area (v2), it's sort of automatically created from the existing inset properties and other stuff known at computed-value time. However, it does go slightly beyond moving the syntax around if it solves the named anchor change issue. :-) > No, we have to have split [...] Right, `transition:all`. I always forget about that. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9598#issuecomment-1820431148 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2023 08:16:39 UTC