- From: Fuqiao Xue via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:43:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> @xfq Thank you. Got it. Do you know why `ideograph-alpha` and `ideograph-numeric` are created when "non-ideograph" might be all what you need? I can't think of scenarios where you create a space only with letters, or only with numbers. They surely do create unbalanced spacing because there are words that start with one kind and end with a different kind like we are seeing with the examples. > > If they are truly useful and needed despite added complexities, I agree `ideograph-symbol`, or actually `ideograph-everything-else` would be necessary. And a definition of `non-ideograph` that covers all characters that are not ideographs would also be super useful. I agree that adding extra spacing only between ideographs and non-ideographic letters, or only between ideographs and non-ideographic numerals is not useful. However, there are some characters that should *not* have extra spacing between ideographs and them, such as: * some Chinese/Japanese punctuation, like 。、，：；！？「」（）《》——…… * footnote marks like *, †, ‡, and ◊ * emoji There are also some characters that I'm not sure, such as Taixuanjing symbols (like U+1D300), mahjong tiles (like U+1F000), Xiangqi symbols (like U+1FA60), copyright/copyleft signs, and so on. -- GitHub Notification of comment by xfq Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9479#issuecomment-1806752683 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 11 November 2023 08:43:47 UTC