- From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:25:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, that does simplify things. I started writing a response, and then saw I had said all the same things above. The main downside I see is the nested potential for `@layer !override.framework.!override.utilities;` etc. (That and my more general fears about authors reaching for _more power_ turning into a layer arms race, but that fear may be unwarranted. Managing the priority of styles is the entire goal here.) I agree `!important` would be the wrong name - it's a different feature with a different mechanism. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6323#issuecomment-1806134750 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 10 November 2023 17:25:25 UTC