- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 18:35:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
We already bikeshedded the names. `child-*()` is out - it reads as referring to the element's children (*especially* in `child-count()`). `sibling-*()` is fine, it's somewhat ambiguous in English but there's no way to be more specific without an absurdly long name. And for indexes, CSS *always* 1-indexes, and specifically `:nth-child()` does, which this clearly mirrors. There was never any possibility we would do anything different. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4559#issuecomment-1799495685 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2023 18:35:44 UTC